Generic Constructor-Pattern agent kit for Claude Code. Zero personal data, fully English, MIT-licensed. Contents: - 34 reusable blocks (baseline, rules, stack/deploy/domain/api/scraper) - 14 cross-project agent manifests (code/ml/infra/researcher/critic/...) - 6 portable skills (/new-agent, /research, /test-gen, /debug-deep, /pr-review, /refactor) - Rust assembler (single binary, ~500 KB) - 3 hooks (auto-reassemble, pre-commit validate, no-hand-edit) - install.sh (idempotent, cargo-builds on first run) - MIT LICENSE All 6 sanity greps pass: 0 Russian text, 0 specific project names, 0 incident numbers, 0 user paths, 0 hardcoded IPs, 0 API keys. cargo check + assemble --validate: both pass on 14 manifests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
967 B
967 B
MATH FIRST (mandatory for ML / physics / theory work)
- Expression first — 1-3 lines LaTeX/Unicode BEFORE prose
- What is UNNECESSARY? — remove before adding
- Learned parameters? WHY? Can you do without?
- Hyperparameters? WHY? Determined by input?
- Activation functions? WHY? Normalize enough?
- Separate projection matrices? WHY? Does the input already encode this?
- Gate/gating? WHY? Normalize = implicit gate?
- Separate decoder? WHY? Can you reuse the state directly as output?
- Count — params, hyperparams, FLOPs, memory
- ONLY THEN — proof / plan / code
Prohibited: prose before expression, "fixes" before experimental confirmation, imposing form instead of deriving from input.
If adding — justify mathematically:
BAD: "let's add decay λ for stability" (where does λ come from?)
GOOD: "the normalization step already contains implicit decay — verify experimentally before adding"