KeiSeiKit-1.0/_primitives/_rust/kei-auth-google/tests/google_client_smoke.rs
Parfii-bot 611b603469 fix(auth): Google OIDC account-takeover (CVE-2023-7028 class) — email_verified gate + sub as user_id + id_token cross-check
Opus Cross-cutting audit found a classic OIDC account-takeover hole in
kei-auth-google::verify(). Same class as the public Booking.com / Slack /
GitLab pattern.

Root cause: verify() accepted info.email from userinfo response as user_id
WITHOUT checking info.email_verified. A Google Workspace admin can mint
accounts with arbitrary unverified email aliases. Attacker then OAuth-flows
into the relying party using a victim's email as their alias and gets a
session bound to that user_id. No email verification = no auth.

Fix in 3 layers (defense in depth):

1. email_verified GATE
   - client.rs: UserInfo gains email_verified: bool with #[serde(default)] —
     absent field defaults to false (fail-closed).
   - error.rs: new Error::EmailNotVerified variant.
   - provider.rs::verify(): rejects with EmailNotVerified before any session
     is built when email_verified != true.

2. sub AS PRIMARY user_id
   - provider.rs::verify(): user_id = info.sub (Google's stable account id),
     NOT info.email. Email is now mutable metadata only. Email reassignment
     in Google Workspace cannot redirect an existing user_id binding.

3. id_token.sub CROSS-CHECK
   - id_token.rs (new, 104 LOC): JWT-claims-only extract_sub() — parses
     base64-payload without signature verification (signature verification
     against Google JWKS is a documented follow-up atomar).
   - provider.rs::verify(): when TokenResponse.id_token is present, decode
     claims and require id_token.sub == userinfo.sub. New
     Error::IdSubMismatch + IdTokenMalformed variants.
   - This adds defense against a forged userinfo response even though
     signature is not yet verified.

Constructor Pattern compliance: provider.rs split into provider.rs (181 LOC)
+ verify_helpers.rs (114 LOC, with unpack_challenge / check_state /
enforce_email_verified / cross_check_id_token_sub helpers). All files <200
LOC, all functions <30 LOC.

Tests added: tests/google_security_regression.rs (164 LOC, 5 dedicated
CVE-2023-7028 regression tests). All 26 tests pass:
- verify_rejects_unverified_email
- verify_rejects_missing_email_verified_field
- verify_uses_sub_not_email_as_user_id
- verify_rejects_id_token_sub_mismatch
- verify_accepts_matching_id_token_sub

cargo check --workspace clean. cargo test -p kei-auth-google: 26/26 pass.

Follow-up: JWT signature verification against Google's JWKS endpoint with
kid-based key cache + RS256/ES256 — separate atomar (~150 LOC).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-03 15:38:53 +08:00

108 lines
3.5 KiB
Rust

// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
// Copyright 2026 <author org>
//!
//! Wiremock smoke tests for `GoogleAuthClient` HTTP layer. No live HTTP.
use kei_auth_google::GoogleAuthClient;
use serde_json::json;
use wiremock::matchers::{body_string_contains, header, method, path};
use wiremock::{Mock, MockServer, ResponseTemplate};
fn client_for(server: &MockServer) -> GoogleAuthClient {
GoogleAuthClient::with_urls(
format!("{}/token", server.uri()),
format!("{}/userinfo", server.uri()),
"client-id-xyz",
"client-secret-xyz",
"https://example.com/cb",
)
.unwrap()
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn token_endpoint_200_returns_access_token() {
let server = MockServer::start().await;
Mock::given(method("POST"))
.and(path("/token"))
.and(body_string_contains("grant_type=authorization_code"))
.and(body_string_contains("code=abc123"))
.and(body_string_contains("client_id=client-id-xyz"))
.respond_with(ResponseTemplate::new(200).set_body_json(json!({
"access_token": "ya29.a0AfH-test",
"expires_in": 3600,
"id_token": "eyJ.fake.jwt"
})))
.expect(1)
.mount(&server)
.await;
let client = client_for(&server);
let token = client.exchange_code("abc123", None).await.unwrap();
assert_eq!(token.access_token, "ya29.a0AfH-test");
assert_eq!(token.expires_in, 3600);
assert_eq!(token.id_token.as_deref(), Some("eyJ.fake.jwt"));
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn userinfo_200_returns_email_and_sub() {
let server = MockServer::start().await;
Mock::given(method("GET"))
.and(path("/userinfo"))
.and(header("authorization", "Bearer ya29.a0AfH-test"))
.respond_with(ResponseTemplate::new(200).set_body_json(json!({
"sub": "1234567890",
"email": "alice@example.com",
"email_verified": true,
"name": "Alice"
})))
.expect(1)
.mount(&server)
.await;
let client = client_for(&server);
let info = client.userinfo("ya29.a0AfH-test").await.unwrap();
assert_eq!(info.sub, "1234567890");
assert_eq!(info.email, "alice@example.com");
assert!(info.email_verified);
assert_eq!(info.name, "Alice");
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn userinfo_omits_email_verified_defaults_to_false() {
let server = MockServer::start().await;
Mock::given(method("GET"))
.and(path("/userinfo"))
.respond_with(ResponseTemplate::new(200).set_body_json(json!({
"sub": "abc",
"email": "x@y.z",
"name": "X"
})))
.expect(1)
.mount(&server)
.await;
let client = client_for(&server);
let info = client.userinfo("any").await.unwrap();
// serde_default safe interpretation: absent ⇒ false ⇒ provider rejects.
assert!(!info.email_verified);
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn exchange_code_400_returns_api_error() {
let server = MockServer::start().await;
Mock::given(method("POST"))
.and(path("/token"))
.respond_with(ResponseTemplate::new(400).set_body_json(json!({
"error": "invalid_grant",
"error_description": "Bad code"
})))
.expect(1)
.mount(&server)
.await;
let client = client_for(&server);
let err = client.exchange_code("bad-code", None).await.unwrap_err();
let msg = format!("{err}");
assert!(msg.contains("api"), "expected api variant, got {msg}");
assert!(msg.contains("400"), "expected status 400 in message, got {msg}");
}